Відео

Okay but is the ending explained i dont get it😢

i wish i grew up away from the internet and social medias. it's been truly detrimental to a lot of us and im glad Bo did his best to discuss about it while being able to empathize with the younger generations.

Where’s the second part?

RIP Stacy Title your remembered to this day friend

Why were the phone screens breaking?

The good things I found in this movie are Performance, BGM Ending is trash🎉

This movie is a trash and you know it when u completely watch the movie its been 5 minutes I watched the movie and I am literally frustrated with the ending as it leaves u unanswered😢😢😢

how emotional and heated he gets talking about the explotation of social media is why i love him. he actually cares so much

Just watched for the first time in 2024. Great movie, loved it! Reminded me of my shroom trip lol . Any recommendations on other mind bending films?

What an amazing interview! Love the moderator! I'd be so lucky to have her for my film school teacher. I'm not super familiar with Emerald Fennell, but this helped me understand and really appreciate her. Great questions, both Wendy & students.

GREAT interview !! Regarding Chris Marker .... make sure and see 'SAN SOLEIL' (Sunless) - Criterion actually did a blu-ray of it a while back.

56:50

What happened to the Em that got left in the bathroom?!?!?!

🤩🌟❕HIS OLDER BROTHER IS MR. REUBEN HILL❕🌟🤩 🤩🌟❕MUST LISTEN TO 🤩🌟😎❕THE 🤩🌟❕ELECTRIFYING MOJO❕🌟🤩 🤩🌟❕ELECTRIFYING MOJO AND THE MOTHERSHIP❕🌟🤩 🤩🌟❕ELECTRIFYING MOJO and the MIDNIGHT FUNK ASSOCIATION❕🌟🤩

🤩🌟❕🤓WHAT UP 👍🏼👍🏼 MR. KRISTIAN HILL🤩❕🌟🤩 😃🌟❕ITS KEVĒKEV😎❕🌟🤩 🤩⭐️❕I WILL SHOW THE WORLD PEOPLE OF THE WORLD MUST KNOW MR. KRISTIAN HILL HAS WEALTH VALUE IMPECCABLE SKILLS AND TALENT❕⭐️🤩 🤩🌟❕PHENOMENAL SKILLS❕🌟🤩

I'm about three years older than bo, and have a 14 year old daughter and I totally agree with him about the way we grew up WITH the internet versus IN the internet. I'm honestly so annoyed with the audience laughing at the serious things he is saying, it's irritating even when he's literally crying. I can't believe he made another "special" after this being funny and singing songs at ALL the devolved into horror and dread. And broke up with his gf who was way older than him and he's been with since he was a teenager. Bizarre. 😊

What a great discussion, this dude is brilliant

Just stumbled across this movie on streaming- what an awesome little film and I love that he's open to talking about the specifics- so many filmmakers like being opaque and it's annoying- talk openly about what you created, especially if it's confusing

and a movie!

22:48

there were three EM's in my opinion. Wish someone would have asked.. Two we see, one we don't see but we can safely assume another EM was the one who broke the windshield when the house was confused about why because there was nothing in the car to take. It appears that EM wanted to do the same thing the main character EM did at the end.. What stopped her was the other world Kevin bumping into her by the car.

It’s really hard to hear him struggling with the breathing 😢

Pedagogical. Only times I’ve ever heard that word were in this interview and when Socko was telling us how the world works.

Stacy was a wonderful person. Miss her a lot.

So BRILLIANT LADY!!! She is smoth and loving, wise and has power, intelligent and delicate. No doubt thats a deveioped soul. Tom was lucky to catch such a partner🥰

Amazing movie

Where is this LEGENDARY SMART director now????

How to fix the internet….diagnosis with no solution…..is a liberal….it’s easy to diagnose

Pertaining to 19:13 as to Folger personae asserting "there was no authorship question": the correct response would have been to say that hey, great, WE AGREE there's no question! Edward de Vere was the author - it's settled. There ISN'T any authorship question.

Pertaining to 16:31 as to the search for a "smoking gun": Oxfordians *already have* a "smoking gun", if we will merely bring it to the forefront of all discussions about the Shakespeare Authorship Revelation. It's from Comedy Of Errors, where servant Dromio of Ephesus says, out of nowhere, “I buy a thousand pound a year, I buy a rope.” IV.1. This is mysterious, no? The “thousand pound a year” has nothing to do with the plot at hand, no? Scholars have long puzzled over this, believing it was some kind of transient reference which Elizabethan theatregoers would have understood but which is now lost in the mists of time. But IMHO (and some Oxfordian scholars have pointed out the possibility that) this was Oxford's referring to his annuity which the normally parsimonious Queen Elizabeth began paying him in June 1586. Can we surmise that, knowing his name could never attach to his writings, Oxford inserted this "thousand pound" clue for future researchers to discover as a link to himself, the true author? Francis Bacon or Christopher Marlowe or other authorship candidates never received any "thousand pound a year", did they? And certainly the Stratford man never did!

Lisa and Laura and Aaron: for 8:55-9:20 could you describe here in the Comments what the audience's reaction was? Had most heard, or not heard, about the Shakespeare Authorship Revelation? And were most aware, or not aware, of this being "controversial"? In watching the video at 8:55-9:20 we cannot tell how many in the audience were raising, or not raising, their hands.

Why didn’t anyone in the audience ask him about what happened in the last scene of the movie??

Great, I remember meeting Mark in Babelsberg Studios 1995. He visited our small effects studio and I showed him my Amiga Lightwave stuff we did at that time. He was so cool and funny and he told me that he used the Amiga and Lightwave himself for the first tests of Dino animations for Jurassic Park. I didn't know who he was when I met him, but I was so impressed when i read about him later and i saw all the productions he did from Abyss, Terminator and Jurassic Park. He is one of the real pioneers and he shaped the industry.

I love apaptations!

coherence is great, and the title kind of sums up the making of the film too!

I've had the pleasure of meeting and chatting with the genius that is Yuri Norsteyn on three occasions in recent times, the last being in the Moscow Book Fair in June 2023. We've signed and dedicated copies of our books to each other, and he will freely give his time to anyone interested in his unique works of art. Like me, he prefers to shun modern devices, prefering instead to stick to various nib thickness ink pens and different grades of pencils to jot down his ideas and notes 🤗

Really good information.

Aisha Muharrar is beautiful 👸🏿

Bo's passion for the psych and sociology behind social media is amazing and so rare. Im autistic, so ive been seeing patterns and trends for years regarding these things. It is absolutely heartbreak thinking of kids now on the internet. Without the internet we had more than enough pressure and suffering. Now that is widespread. Parents post their babies from BIRTH, their toddlers eating ice cream (with 7m saves by pedos), their kids in bikinis, on the toilet, everywhere. Then the kids grow up and post themselves, following the trend, copying celebrities. Damaging their mental health more and more. Opening themselves up to predators because NO adult is stepping in. The falsity of the social side, the self image side are bad enough, without the millions of predators hopping on there too. Dont even get me started on porn and how literal children are exposed to the most violent obscure bizzare sex acts before they've hit puberty. Thats horrific. The internet is like one big grooming machine. 'show your body' 'show what you eat' 'everyones watching you' 'heres porn' 'heres a predator' Its insane.

Nice interview. I love that ant book too.

real vip guys...very influential people ...indeed

Plate of shrimp.

My thought: (Spoiler alert!) Emily with jacket and Emily without are the two that co-exist at the end. Both of them drugged the two Emilys. The first one that took the jacket doesn't have a ring. Look at Emily's right hand when she was thrown at the trunk (the ring she wore was gone). When they watched the comet, Emily was gone. No one can notice her inside the house. The second Emily took that chance to attack another Emily (who presumably went to that house too given she doesn't look horrified anymore when other Emily attacked her. She seems to know what was going on unlike the real Emily to that house that is oblivious to different realities). When she passed out, maybe the other Emily with jacket decided to hide since she has everyone's attention and you know what will happen if they were seen at the same time. Emily with jacket is the only logical person that can call Kevin that morning because she knew where the real Emily's phone is or even has it after she took her things.

so linwood climbed the ladder while the others 2 had contacts

Horrible filmmakers

Why did you kill off Beth? WHY??? WHY LIKE THAT?

Interesting guy. Great sense of humor. Repo Man is one of my favorite movies of all time.

Love this so much thank you

I forgot he made 8th Grade. Fantastic film

Lots of interesting infos in this interview, unfortunately nobody asked why the sweater / no sweater cut :( Trunk Emliy having the phone i think is simply a call back to Schrodinger's box, trunk Emily both has no phone, and has a phone, the inside of the trunk is still decoherent I think the bathroom was too up until Kevin opened it and this is why the only thing he found is the ring If they opened the trunk before the call, trunk Emily and the phone probably would have disappeared too I was already pretty sure we always followed the same Em who arrived at the "wrong house" from the very beginning, but i still can't figure out why she is missing the sweater right after the last power cut I've watched this movie dozens of times in a few years, but i think i'm just not smart enough to grasp that last clue